首页> 外文OA文献 >Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method - A qualitative observational study
【2h】

Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method - A qualitative observational study

机译:使用案例方法监测健康科学教育中临床推理技能的进展 - 定性观察研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Outcome- or competency-based education is well established in medical and health sciences education. Curricula are based on courses where students develop their competences and assessment is also usually course-based. Clinical reasoning is an important competence, and the aim of this study was to monitor and describe students' progression in professional clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using observations of group discussions following the case method. Methods: In this qualitative study students from three different health education programmes were observed while discussing clinical cases in a modified Harvard case method session. A rubric with four dimensions - problem-solving process, disciplinary knowledge, character of discussion and communication - was used as an observational tool to identify clinical reasoning. A deductive content analysis was performed. Results: The results revealed the students' transition over time from reasoning based strictly on theoretical knowledge to reasoning ability characterized by clinical considerations and experiences. Students who were approaching the end of their education immediately identified the most important problem and then focused on this in their discussion. Practice knowledge increased over time, which was seen as progression in the use of professional language, concepts, terms and the use of prior clinical experience. The character of the discussion evolved from theoretical considerations early in the education to clinical reasoning in later years. Communication within the groups was supportive and conducted with a professional tone. Conclusions: Our observations revealed progression in several aspects of students' clinical reasoning skills on a group level in their discussions of clinical cases. We suggest that the case method can be a useful tool in assessing quality in health sciences education.
机译:背景:基于结果或胜任力的教育在医学和健康科学教育中已得到充分确立。课程以学生发展能力的课程为基础,评估通常也是基于课程的。临床推理是一项重要的能力,本研究的目的是通过案例研究后的小组讨论观察来监测和描述学生在健康科学教育过程中专业临床推理技能的进步。方法:在这项定性研究中,在改良的哈佛病例法课程中讨论临床病例时,观察了来自三个不同健康教育计划的学生。解决问题的过程,学科知识,讨论和沟通的特点等四个方面的规范被用作观察工具,以识别临床推理。进行了演绎内容分析。结果:结果表明,随着时间的推移,学生从严格基于理论知识的推理到以临床考虑和经验为特征的推理能力的转变。即将结束学业的学生会立即发现最重要的问题,然后在讨论中重点关注这个问题。实践知识随着时间的推移而增加,这被视为专业语言,概念,术语和先前临床经验的使用的发展。讨论的性质从早期的理论考虑演变为后来的临床推理。各小组之间的交流是支持性的,并以专业的语气进行。结论:我们的观察揭示了学生在讨论临床病例时在小组水平上在临床推理技能几个方面的进展。我们建议案例方法可以作为评估健康科学教育质量的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号